Archaeology & History

On earth as it is in heaven – was Orion linked to Orkney’s Neolithic heartland?

Written by Sigurd Towrie
If there is one constellation that dominates an Orkney winter, it must surely be Orion.
Orion over the Ring o' Brodgar in January 2005
Orion over the Ring o’ Brodgar in January 2005.

Even to those not remotely interested in astronomy, this pattern of stars is one of the most striking and recognisable in the night sky. Four bright stars form an hourglass shape around Orion’s “belt” – a band of three stars forming a straight (or almost straight) line.

As a child I took pride in being able to point out Orion, and, even back then, recognised the fact that it was a winter constellation. When Orion was high, you knew that Christmas was nearby.

The constellation returns to the sky in late autumn, at which time it doesn’t rise until after midnight. But as the days shorten, Orion’s appears earlier and earlier and by midwinter dominates the southern sky.

He remains visible until early spring, his disappearance coinciding with the return of life and light to the islands.

I had often wondered whether the constellation had any significance to our ancient ancestors – but, knowing how these theories can often raise the bile of academia, left it well alone.

Until 2005.

Thornborough Henges

Then, I heard about a site in England that had hit the national news headlines because it was under threat from industrial quarrying. The 5,500-year-old Thornborough Henges, in North Yorkshire, had been declared to be the world’s first monument aligned to Orion.

At the head of the research was the eminent archaeologist, Dr Jan Harding, senior lecturer at Newcastle University. He claimed that using 3D computer models, he could show the site had a number of stellar alignments. But above all this, what really caught the media’s attention was the similarity of the placing of the three great henges on the landscape and the three stars of Orion’s Belt.

In addition, archaeological work at Thornborough suggested that Orion was significant prior to the construction of the three henges.

The first major monument on the site was built around 3,500BC. This was a 1.2km-long processional way, aligned so its western end pointed towards the mid-winter setting of Orion. This also meant the eastern end aligned to the midsummer solstice.

Then, around 3000BC, when the three henges at Thornborough were constructed, they appear to have been deliberately laid out to mirror Orion’s Belt. Not only this, but their southern entrances framed the rising of the bright star, Sirius, which in turn meant their axis aligned on the midwinter solstice.

In an article at the time, Dr Harding explained: “Thornborough was a sacred landscape, a place of religious worship, and we should try to interpret these astronomical orientations within that context.

“This astronomical association was emphasised by the banks of the henges being coated in brilliant white gypsum. Neolithic people surely felt they were at the centre of the very cosmos as they worshipped the heavens above.”

Professor Clive Ruggles, author of Astronomy in Prehistoric Britain and Ireland, was not so convinced by the Orion’s belt layout of the henges.
In 2003, following a television documentary on Thornborough, he wrote on his website:

The idea that the configuration of the henges themselves formed a spatial representation of the three stars is something that I view with considerable scepticism.”

He did, however, concede that it is plausible that the rising of the stars, in relation to the local landscape, may have been significant.

He said: “For the record, it is the other aspects of the astronomical arguments at Thornborough, notably the various alignments upon the horizon rising position of Orion’s Belt, combined with the other evidence for Thornborough being some sort of pilgrimage centre, that combine to make a plausible case that the heliacal rising of Orion’s Belt was the trigger that caused people to set out on their journey to the site from afar for an autumn ceremony.”

So what does this have to do with Orkney?

As mentioned above, I had always wondered about the layout of the three henges in Orkney’s World Heritage Site – the Standing Stones o’ Stenness, the Ring o’ Brodgar and Ring o’ Bookan.

Indeed, anyone looking at a map of the area would spot one apparent link immediately. Overlay the stars of Orion’s Belt over a map of the Ness and you get a matching layout (see right)

The distance ratios between Bookan and Stenness fit perfectly, although the middle star is slightly out over Brodgar. This is not that surprising, however. If the layout is not mere coincidence, the prehistoric observer could reasonably measure the distance ration between the stars, but not the minute angle involved.

But even if we accept that the layout of the three Orkney henges is pure chance, it could still be argued that their siting was significant to the appearance, and movement, of Orion in the winter sky.

Orion rising

Orion Rising. 2500BC Solstice
Orion Rising. 2500BC Solstice.

From the Ring o’ Bookan, looking down across the Ness o’ Brodgar, the Stones o’ Stenness are almost exactly south-east (actually a few degrees to the south).

A prehistoric observer standing at Bookan, at midwinter, would see the giant Orion rising over the Stenness monument (see illustration right).

So, for example, were we sitting at Bookan at midwinter 2500BC (which by our calendar would be January 9), Orion’s belt would appear above the south-eastern horizon, in the gap between the Firth and Orphir hills, around 4.30pm. Orion’s rising would be followed shortly afterwards by the appearance of the star Sirius, one of the brightest objects in the night sky.

The constellation would then move across the top of the Orphir hills, at an altitude 11 degrees lower than today, before setting again just after midnight.

Where Orion, and Sirius, sets is also interesting. The constellation would have slipped behind the Hoy hills – approximately 23 degrees further west from the spot the midwinter sun had “died” earlier that day.

Was it this noticeable correlation with the movement of the midwinter sun that may have marked Orion as significant? Nobody argues about the connection between the winter solstice sun and Maeshowe, for example, but Orion not only sets in the same area as the winter sun, but it rises in the same area too – in effect it could be seen to be following the sun.

Classical mythology depicts Orion as a hunter, trekking across the night sky followed by his faithful hounds. But what, if anything, did the group of stars represent to the early Orcadians?

Was it seen as responsible for the annual death of the sun? A fearful entity who’s eventual demise marked the return of life and warmth to the land? Or was it a valiant consort, or ally, of the dying sun, whose sacrifice ensured the return the light?

Or perhaps something else?

In late 2006, I came across an intriguing possibility in a new book on Stonehenge.

Midwinter celebrations

In his book, Stonehenge: The Biography of a Landscape, Professor Timothy Darvill, head of the Archaeology Group at Bournemouth University, outlined his theory that Stonehenge was an oracle and a centre for healing – not just a place for the dead, as is believed by many scholars.

The basis of his theory lies in the Preseli Mountains in Wales, 250 kilometres away from Stonehenge, and the source of the monument’s massive bluestones.

He said: “It was believed that these particular stones had many healing properties because in Preseli, there are many sacred springs that are considered to have health-giving qualities; the water comes out of the rocks used to build Stonehenge and it’s well established that as recently as the late 18th century, people went to Stonehenge to break off bits of rock as talismans.”

Also, around the Stonehenge landscape, there are many burials, some of which have been excavated and amongst these there are a good proportion of people who show sings of being unwell – some would have walked with a limp or had broken bones – just the sort of thing that in modern times pressurises people to seek help from the Almighty.”

Professor Darvill is firmly of the opinion that the monument was believed to be at its most potent in the winter, when it was “occupied” by a prehistoric god.

This god, he suggests, was the equivalent of the Greek god of healing, hunting and music, Apollo, whom Greek myth tells us “chose” to reside in the north – in the land of the Hyperboreans – for three months each winter.

Professor Darvill said: “In the case of Stonehenge, I suggest that the presiding deity was a prehistoric equivalent of the Greek and Roman god of healing, Apollo. Although his main sanctuary was at Delphi in Greece, it is widely believed that he left Greece in the winter months to reside in the land of the Hyperboreans – usually taken to be Britain.”

According to the Roman writer, Diodorus Siculus, Britain was inhabited by the Hyperboreans and was the birthplace of Apollo’s mother, Leto.

Because of this, he wrote:

Apollo is honoured among them above all other gods; and the inhabitants are looked upon as priests of Apollo, after a manner, since daily they praise this god continuously in song and honour him exceedingly. And there is also on the island both a magnificent sacred precinct of Apollo and a notable temple which is adorned with many votive offerings and is spherical in shape.”

Did Orion represent this ancient prehistoric god? A deity who presided over the darkest time of the year?

It is interesting to wonder whether Maeshowe’s midwinter alignment, when the light of the setting sun shines into the main chamber for a few days around the winter solstice, could have marked a time significant to this god.

And if so, and following Professor Darvill’s Stonehenge theory, was the Brodgar complex also a pilgrimage site – visited by those wishing to commune with the god(s) and perhaps seek cures for their ailments?

The healing aspects of the Orcadian stone circles are well-known in more recent history, in particular the connection between the rings and the nearby well at Bigswell. In addition, there at least six wells survived on the Ness o’ Brodgar into the 1800s – and at least one of these is said to have had healing powers.

Those seeking cures at Bigswell were plunged into the well’s cold water before being bound to a nearby post and left overnight. A secondary element of the healing rituals involved the Odin Stone – the holed-megalith that was also renowned for its magical cures.

How ancient these healing traditions were is open to debate, so, once again, we can only speculate.

But at the end of the day, even if Orion and Orkney’s best-known Neolithic monuments have absolutely no connection, the Ring o’ Brodgar remains one of the finest, and most atmospheric, places in the county to view the constellation’s procession across the winter sky.

Sigurd Towrie

The material here was first published on Sigurd Towrie’s Orkneyjar website:

About the author

Sigurd Towrie

Sigurd Towrie writes widely on archaeology and its links with history and folklore, both in The Orcadian, of which he is news editor, and on the Orkneyjar website, which is dedicated to preserving, exploring and documenting the ancient history, folklore and traditions of the islands.